Skip to main content

Belo Monte Hydroelectric Dam – Update

The Belo Monte hydroelectric dam is under construction on the Volta Grande section of the Xingu River. It is already having a substantial impact on the lives of the Juruna, Arara and Xicrin indigenous people who live there. Since the construction of a ‘coffer’ dam – a temporary dam to enable construction work on the main installations to take place – the water quality has deteriorated dramatically. The river is the principal source of drinking water and is the bathing place for these villages, so the dramatic rise in the amount of sediment in the water is a serious issue, directly affecting their health, their hygiene and their ability to feed themselves.

Human Banner Protest, Rio+20

Human Banner Protest, Rio+20

The dam construction company was supposed to provide alternative sources of clean water before they undertook work which would affect the river in this way, but they have failed to do so. Several other provisions were included in an ’emergency fund’ package and a Basic Environmental Plan, but so far nothing has been put in place. The company has not even ensured the maintenance of river transport, the vital and only connection the villages have to town for emergency medical treatment, purchasing goods and trading products.

Protest Banner, Belo Monte Dam Site

Protest Banner, Belo Monte; courtesy Amazon Watch

“They are not complying with what they promised to do in our villages,” said indigenous leader Mukuka Xicrin, “principally the [legally required] conditions [imposed by Brazil’s environment agency], everything is being left to fall behind. We are seeing that the destruction of nature and of the river is very great, and we are not going to let them carry on with the work any more. We need the press to come here to let the whole world know what is happening here. The government keeps saying that we are OK, but no, the situation here is really bad, we people who will bear the impact don’t have any guarantee about our rights whatever. And we’re asking the courts to call a halt to the works of Belo Monte.”

Rivers For Life, Rio+20

Rivers For Life, Rio+20. Courtesy Amazon Watch

More about the occupation from Amazon Watch here
and from International Rivers here

Indigenous groups have occupied the site for over a week in an attempt to force the construction company to fulfill its legal undertakings. While the occupation was taking place in the Amazon, a group of over 1,500 indigenous people and their supporters made a sympathetic living work of art on Flamengo beach during the Rio+20 People’s Summit, joining their bodies together to make the design of an Indian chief holding his hand up symbolically to the sun. This followed a similar protest at the site of the dam, where people formed the words ‘Pare Belo Monte’ (Stop Belo Monte) using their bodies. They also dug a symbolic break through the temporary dam.

Pare Belo Monte images here

Rio+20 Human Artwork images here

The construction company has attempted to get the courts to order the forcible removal of the protestors, but the local court sided with the protestors and ordered the company to enter into negotiations. It remains to be seen if they will comply, or merely appeal the ruling to a judge in Brasilia. In past cases judges in the capital have been more amenable to the company’s views than the local judges, who have a direct understanding of the situation. A report from the inter-American lawyer’s organisation which is supporting the protestors can be found here.

Hello From Rio+20

We’re at the end of Rio+20, the grandly-named United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, twenty years on from the landmark Earth Summit of 1992.

If anyone was relying on Rio+20 as a landmark I would suggest investing in a satnav, because the only thing remarkable about this landmark is its insignificance.

Cynicism aside, parallel to the UN conference was the People’s Summit, an hour away in Rio’s Flamengo Park, where there was visibly more commitment, passion and action. It was at the People’s Summit that the indigenous delegations spent most of their time, and they were a powerful and influential presence. They drew massive support and respect from the general public. More than 1,500 indigenous people from all over Brazil, South America and the world were here.

Kayapo Indians Arriving at the People's SummitThough our Just Giving campaign to raise funds to help some of the communities we work with to attend was a massive disappointment, we did receive substantial grants from the Roddick Foundation and Artists Project Earth at the last minute, which helped two communities to send representatives whose voices would not otherwise have been heard. We extend our thanks from them to the few who did donate; your money went to help feed those who were here when it became apparent that the food provided for them was both very poor quality and vastly insufficient.

Brazilian indigenous protestor at Rio+20Inevitably there was much discussion and several peaceful but forceful actions about the Belo Monte hydroelectric dam, which is moving ahead despite legal challenges from Brazil’s public prosecutors, the UN and the Inter American Committee on Human Rights. We went to the launch of ‘Xingu: A Declaration of War’, a full-length documentary film. I recommend it to anyone interested in indigenous peoples, human rights, the Amazon environment – or sustainable development – it runs 1hr 44mins, is free to distribute and is sobering. Because we know practically all of the people who feature in the film personally, we can vouch for its accuracy in representing their views. Here’s the link to the site:

Xingu: A Declaration of War

You can see some of Sue Cunningham’s photos from Rio+20 on her commercial website:

Sue Cunningham Photographic Rio+20 Photo Galleries

and Patrick Cunningham submitted a report to the Latin America Bureau website:

Latin America Bureau

Rio+20: United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, June 2012

Rio+20 – A Bit of History

Rio in 1992 – UNCED: 172 countries, 108 Heads of State – Climate Change & Biodiversity Conventions. Patchy implementation and progress since, overshadowed by corporate growth – TNCs and the WTO. Conflict between profit and the Environment.

UNCED Logo from 1992

Twenty years ago, 172 of the world’s leaders, including 108 Heads of State – our own Prime Minister John Major and the US President George Bush (the elder) included – met in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil for a groundbreaking world conference, the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, UNCED. They signed into effect two crucial United Nations treaties; the Climate Change Convention and the Biodiversity Convention.

These two binding treaties, together with three further agreements – Agenda 21, the Rio Declaration and the Statement on Forest Principles – were the basis for a plethora of effective and forward-looking projects, programmes and laws, on every level from the smallest Agenda 21 project affecting just a small plot of community land to international efforts to control climate change and protect biodiversity.

John Major signing the Biodiversity Convention, UNCED 1992

John Major signing the Biodiversity Convention

The development of these has been patchy and has fallen short of hopes and expectations, but overall we are in a very much better position in the 21st century than would have been the case without UNCED.

But all the gains made on the environmental front have been overshadowed by the explosive growth in consumption and the rapid expansion of trans-national corporations (TNCs) whose motivation is driven by only one thing – profit. In 1990 there were 3,000 TNCs; today there are 63,000!

The intervening years have also seen the establishment of the World Trade Organsiation (WTO), the most powerful and effective UN organisation ever. Often the WTO is in direct conflict with the vital needs of the environment, and sadly it is usually the WTO which takes precedence.

Where To Now?

Environment in second place to profit – danger of environmental disintegration – need for change – the place of indigenous people – Running Out Of Time – TNCs as part of the solution with their resources and dynamism.

If we carry on along the road we are on, the interests of the environment will always take second place to those of the TNCs and international finacial institutions, with disastrous consequences – spiralling environmental degradation, ever-diminishing water resources, out-of-control climate change and growing human impoverishment. We need to change. And Rio+20 is an excellent focus through which we can initiate that change.

Asurini Woman with Sweet potatoes

Asurini Woman with Sweet potatoes

The indigenous people who will attend Rio+20 are charismatic and visually compelling. Because their entire cultures and ways of life depend on their close interrelationship  with the natural environment they will be putting the case for protecting the planet’s wild ecosystems in a robust way.

Scientists, environmentalists and civil society groups are worried that time is running out. Unfortunately the draft proposals from the UN for Rio+20 are weak, non-binding and a poor compromise. The only way that something positive will come out of Rio is if the non-UN sector comes together with one voice to demand change.

And change can come. Within the TNCs there is a growing awareness that they are locked into a dangerous path of growing and unsustainable natural resource consumption, but they are effectively prisoners of the profit motive – which is underpinned by legal obligations and hemmed in by the underlying structure of our world economy.

Petrobras Research Centre

Petrobras Research Centre

We need the TNCs to become part of the solution to the problem, because they control the bulk of the resources we need to rapidly re-focus the economy. By the year 2000, 53 of the largest economic entities in the world were corporations, not countries, each one with more wealth than over 120 nation states. We need their resources, we need their expertise and we need their entrepreneurship if we are to change the course of humanity in time to head off climate change and resource over-exploitation before it is too late.

Indigenous People; Part of the Solution

Indigenous people suffering from resource over-exploitation, have the understanding and spiritual relationship with the Earth – their long-term view to the sixth generation.

Indigenous people are at the receiving end of this over-exploitation. It is they whose land is scarred and despoiled by mining operations, it is they whose villages are flooded – or denied water – by mega hydroeletric dams, and it is they whose sources of sustenance and well-being are stolen when the forest is felled to make way for soya, cattle and biofuels. Pressures on indigenous people the world over have been ratcheting up rapidly in the 21st century and show no signs of reducing.

Warrior Phinya Matipu

Warrior Phinya Matipu

Yet it is also they who have the understanding of the natural environment and the respect for the balance inherent in a proper relationship between man and nature. Their strong spiritual belief in man’s integration in the totality of the global environment would not have allowed them to embark on the profligate and careless despoilment of the earth which we have seen in the last 250 years. They plan with the well-being of the next six generations in mind; with that as a starting point we could never have made the myriad wrong turns we have.

We need to listen to them. We need to take on board the interests of the sixth generation. Our planning cannot be in terms of five-year plans, nor can we base our politics on the need to face the electorate in a few years. Our idea of long-term planning is inadequate and pitiful.

What Can Rio+20 Deliver?

The Future We Want, Rio+20With the UN’s ambition practically at zero, Rio+20 has to look to a movement of the peoples of the world, indigenous and rural, urban and metropolitan, remote and mainstream, for any progress. By uniting people in a call for change, in a shout for the re-balancing of civilisation, Rio+20 can be the starting point for a dynamic shift in public perception which will force our national and international institutions to re-shape themselves.

Let’s do it!


Would you like to know more? For a longer discussion in pdf format, go here